Go to top or bottom of previous codebook page

ANES 2020 Time Series Full Release


Preferences in Hiring/Promotion for Blacks

V202249POST: For or against preferential hiring/promotion of blacks
Percent N Value Label
31.4 2,271 1 1. For preferential hiring and promotion of blacks
68.6 4,972 2 2. Against preferential hiring and promotion of blacks


161 -9 -9. Refused


16 -8 -8. Don't know


77 -7 -7. No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


754 -6 -6. No post-election interview


29 -5 -5. Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202250POST: Favor preferential hiring/promotion of blacks strongly or not strongly
Percent N Value Label
58.7 1,334 1 1. Strongly
41.3 937 2 2. Not strongly


77 -7 -7. No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


754 -6 -6. No post-election interview


29 -5 -5. Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)


5,149 -1 -1. Inapplicable

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202251POST: Oppose preferential hiring/promotion blacks strongly or not strongly
Percent N Value Label
64.8 3,219 1 1. Strongly
35.2 1,746 2 2. Not strongly


7 -9 -9. Refused


77 -7 -7. No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


754 -6 -6. No post-election interview


29 -5 -5. Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)


2,448 -1 -1. Inapplicable

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202252xPOST: SUMMARY: Favor/oppose preferential hiring/promotion of blacks
Percent N Value Label
18.4 1,334 1 1. Strongly for preferential hiring/promotion of blacks
12.9 937 2 2. Not strongly for preferential hiring/promotion of blacks
24.1 1,746 3 3. Not strongly against preferential hiring/promotion of blacks
44.5 3,219 4 4. Strongly against preferential hiring/promotion of blacks


77 -7 -7. No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


754 -6 -6. No post-election interview


29 -5 -5. Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)


184 -2 -2. DK/RF V202249, V202250, or V202251

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0

Government Doing More or Less and Regulation

V202253POST: Less government better OR more that government should be doing
Percent N Value Label
41.5 3,055 1 1. The less government the better
58.5 4,299 2 2. More things government should be doing


61 -9 -9. Refused


5 -8 -8. Don't know


77 -7 -7. No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


754 -6 -6. No post-election interview


29 -5 -5. Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202254POST: Less government better OR more that government should be doing (STRENGTH)
Percent N Value Label
46.9 3,447 1 1. Very strongly
44.8 3,289 2 2. Somewhat strongly
8.3 612 3 3. Not strongly


6 -9 -9. Refused


77 -7 -7. No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


754 -6 -6. No post-election interview


29 -5 -5. Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)


66 -1 -1. Inapplicable

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202255xPOST:SUMMARY: Less or more government
Percent N Value Label
22.4 1,645 1 1. Feels strongly less government better
15.7 1,157 2 2. Feels somewhat strongly less government better
3.4 250 3 3. Feels not strongly less government better
4.9 362 4 4. Feels not strongly more things government should be doing
29.0 2,132 5 5. Feels somewhat stongly more things government should be doing
24.5 1,802 6 6. Feels strongly more things government should be doing


77 -7 -7. No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


754 -6 -6. No post-election interview


29 -5 -5. Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)


72 -2 -2. DK/RF V202253 or V202254

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202256POST: Would it be good for society to have more or less government regulation
Percent N Value Label
4.6 341 1 1. Much more
12.0 883 2 2. Somewhat more
14.6 1,077 3 3. A little more
28.7 2,118 4 4. About the same amount
15.3 1,125 5 5. A little less
11.5 851 6 6. Somewhat less
13.3 980 7 7. Much less


42 -9 -9. Refused


3 -8 -8. Don't know


77 -7 -7. No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


754 -6 -6. No post-election interview


29 -5 -5. Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0

Income Inequality

V202257POST: Favor or oppose government trying to reduce income inequality
Percent N Value Label
45.5 3,357 1 1. Favor
29.2 2,155 2 2. Oppose
25.4 1,874 3 3. Neither favor nor oppose


28 -9 -9. Refused


6 -8 -8. Don't know


77 -7 -7. No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


754 -6 -6. No post-election interview


29 -5 -5. Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202258POST: Favor or oppose government trying to reduce income inequality (STRENGTH)
Percent N Value Label
59.3 3,269 1 1. A great deal
34.0 1,871 2 2. A moderate amount
6.7 370 3 3. A little


2 -9 -9. Refused


77 -7 -7. No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


754 -6 -6. No post-election interview


29 -5 -5. Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)


1,908 -1 -1. Inapplicable

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202259xPOST: SUMMARY: Favor/oppose government trying to reduce income inequality
Percent N Value Label
26.1 1,928 1 1. Favor a great deal
16.3 1,200 2 2. Favor a moderate amount
3.1 228 3 3. Favor a little
25.4 1,874 4 4. Neither favor nor oppose
1.9 142 5 5. Oppose a little
9.1 671 6 6. Oppose a moderate amount
18.2 1,341 7 7. Oppose a great deal


77 -7 -7. No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


754 -6 -6. No post-election interview


29 -5 -5. Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)


36 -2 -2. DK/RF in 202257 or V202258

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0

Beliefs About Equality or Inequality

V202260POST: Society should make sure everyone has equal opportunity
Percent N Value Label
53.0 3,928 1 1. Agree strongly
26.7 1,981 2 2. Agree somewhat
10.1 749 3 3. Neither agree nor disagree
6.3 466 4 4. Disagree somewhat
3.8 282 5 5. Disagree strongly


11 -9 -9. Refused


77 -7 -7. No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


754 -6 -6. No post-election interview


32 -5 -5. Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202261POST: We'd be better off if worried less about equality
Percent N Value Label
11.4 841 1 1. Agree strongly
19.0 1,404 2 2. Agree somewhat
17.8 1,318 3 3. Neither agree nor disagree
19.4 1,431 4 4. Disagree somewhat
32.4 2,397 5 5. Disagree strongly


24 -9 -9. Refused


2 -8 -8. Don't know


77 -7 -7. No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


754 -6 -6. No post-election interview


32 -5 -5. Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202262POST: Not a big problem if some have more chance in life
Percent N Value Label
4.4 323 1 1. Agree strongly
13.1 968 2 2. Agree somewhat
23.5 1,736 3 3. Neither agree nor disagree
25.8 1,906 4 4. Disagree somewhat
33.3 2,466 5 5. Disagree strongly


18 -9 -9. Refused


77 -7 -7. No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


754 -6 -6. No post-election interview


32 -5 -5. Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202263POST: If people were treated more fairly we would have fewer problems
Percent N Value Label
35.4 2,617 1 1. Agree strongly
32.0 2,368 2 2. Agree somewhat
16.2 1,202 3 3. Neither agree nor disagree
10.4 770 4 4. Disagree somewhat
6.0 442 5 5. Disagree strongly


15 -9 -9. Refused


2 -8 -8. Don't know


77 -7 -7. No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


754 -6 -6. No post-election interview


33 -5 -5. Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
Go to Next Page of Codebook